DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment As part of a larger lawsuit against the city of Vancouver, DLG successfully represented six community centre associations in bringing an injunction to stop the city from terminating contracts between the city and the associations and kicking the associations out of the community centres they help build. Read more...Read More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment At the conclusion of a hard-fought case the BC Supreme Court found in favour of the city who sought to prohibit two hookah lounge owners from allowing their customers to smoke herbal shisha in traditional hookahs. The case challenged the validity of the City of Vancouver bylaw on multiple...Read More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment An individual working for a school brought a complaint to the Human Rights Tribunal on allegations of racial discrimination. DLG represented the individual when the school district tried to have his complaint dismissed and was successful in having the school district’s application dismissed. The matters eventually settled. Read more...Read More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment DLG acted for an individual who invested in a real estate project with a partner and then sued after that partner breached their agreement by failing to pay him his share of the proceeds. The B.C. Supreme Court awarded DLG’s client damages for the lost proceeds and costs. Read...Read More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment DLG navigated a case where an individual was facing fraud charges by successfully varying an injunction that had frozen his assets to allow him to access his money for the purpose of funding his legal defense. Read more about this case at this link CanLIIRead More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment DLG represented six Vancouver community centre associations in an injunction application to stop the City of Vancouver unilaterally implementing the OneCard. The associations were not successful in Court after the City agreed to not implement the OneCard in the applicable community centres. Read more about this case at this...Read More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment DLG represented a gold exploration company acquiring a nickel mining company in a reverse merger, which sought and received Court approval. Read more about this case at this link CanLIIRead More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment In a Supreme Court case dealing with a family dispute over the management of a trust and trust assets, DLG represented one of the trustees. The Court considered issues of the trustees’ duties, trust interpretation, and application of foreign law. Read more about this case at this link CanLIIRead More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment DLG represented a city employee who filed a human rights complaint after his employer allegedly tried to restrict the expressing of his political beliefs. DLG defeated the city’s application to have the employee’s complaint thrown out. Read more about this case at this link CanLIIRead More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment DLG represented an association of residents who challenged the City and a commercial developer who planned to build a high-rise building in their community on the basis that the building plans had not been properly vetted and approved as required under the Vancouver Charter. Read more about this case at...Read More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment DLG’s clients – a small business and an individual homeowner – faced an application by a company that had previously sued them and lost in Supreme Court. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal to proceed but denied the company’s application for a stay. Read more about this case...Read More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment DLG acted for an individual suing the City of Vancouver and a City employee for defamation. Read more about this case at this link CanLIIRead More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment Prior to founding DLG, Dean Davison represented one of several defendants in a case brought by ICBC with regard to allegations of staged motor vehicle accidents. Read more about this case at this link CanLIIRead More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment Prior to founding DLG, Dean Davison represented an individual against the party’s application for a declaration of contempt of court against that individual. Read more about this case at this link CanLIIRead More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment Prior to founding DLG, Dean Davison represented a small business employer before the Human Rights Tribunal with regard to an employee’s allegations of discrimination on the basis of age and sex. Read more about this case at this link CanLIIRead More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment DLG represented a former union employee before the B.C. Labour Relations Board in seeking reconsideration of a decision by the union to dismiss his prior complaint brought against the union under section 12 of the B.C. Labour Relations Code. Read more about this case at this link CanLIIRead More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment Prior to founding DLG, Dean Davison was one of the lawyers representing the defendant in a lawsuit dealing with contract law, mortgage repayment, and issues of credibility of the parties. Read more about this case at this link CanLIIRead More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment DLG represented an employee and union member who sought judicial review of the Labour Relations Board, dismissing a complaint he had made against his union for failing to adequately represent him against his employer after he was wrongfully accused of wrongdoing. Read more about this case at this link...Read More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment DLG represented a yacht company in an appeal in Federal Court dealing with contract and international maritime law. Read more about this case at this link CanLIIRead More

DNL Case – Reasons for Judgment Both prior to and after founding DLG, Dean Davison represented the interests of an individual in a trial lasting 31 days which required analysis of international law in the enforcement of an Iranian divorce and separation agreement in Canada Read more about this case at this link CanLIIRead More